Article No:1
Perhaps the most often cited shortcoming of the cable industry's collective business plan is that it lacks a meaningful wireless component. In big and small ways, the industry confronted that old bugaboo in a trio of moves this month.
The most news was generated by the consummation of the long envisioned WiMax marriage of Sprint and Clearwire. Cable players have a minority but significant role: Comcast, Time Warner and Bright House each have a small piece of the deal.
The other deal announcement is flashier than that junior partnership arrangement. Cablevision said that it will create a Wi-Fi network over its prime New York/Connecticut service area. A public Wi-Fi network aimed to serve the Long Island chunk of that footprint is in trouble, which may have played some role in Cablevision's decision. Cable Digital News says the operator will provide free access to its broadband subscribers and invite others on for a fee. The network will cost $70 per home passed to build and offer speeds as high as 1.5 Mbps. Eventually, executives say, the network will be voice-capable.
Finally, Cogeco Cable, which claims to be the second-largest operator in Quebec and Portugal in terms of basic subscribers, said on Wednesday that it had launched its Quebec Wi-Fi service in Trois-Rivieres, Quebec. The service is free to Cogeco broadband subscribers and available for $5 for a two-hour session.
A MediaPost blog posting, published a few days before announcement of the Sprint/Clearwire deal, is prescient. The theme is that the industry's "nagging absence of a wireless strategy" could turn into an Achilles' heel. On one hand, wireless services are extremely popular and growing more so. On the other, people like bundled services that save them money. The bottom line is that it is unwise not to have a wireless product.
The cable industry certainly has more wireless tricks up its sleeve. A recent piece at GigaOm provides interesting tidbits. Vulcan Ventures won a B-block license at the recent 700 MHz auction. Vulcan is owned by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, who also owns Charter Communications. The piece also says that Comcast Wireless spent $304 million on 14 Block A and B licenses and already has awarded an equipment contract to Huawei. The company hired the CTO of Telefonica O2 Europe as senior vice president of wireless and technology strategy.
The era of standalone products is passing. Most subscribers have two, three or four services from the same company. Cable operators are a lot of things, but dumb isn't one of them. It is inevitable that the industry will make a significant play in the wireless sector. What remains to be seen is whether it is a defensive "me-too" effort aimed at negating the issue or an aggressive initiative design to proactively seek out converts.
Read Carl's article, "Two Many Cooks in the Sprint/Clearwire Kitchen?" at http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/cip/?p=334 Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Carl_Weinschenk
When deciding whether your business should choose T1 Or DS3 Bandwidth .... The real answer is: It depends 1. It depends on your location and what other alternatives you have including the cost 2. It depends on the business need and the SLA requirements in terms of latency, scalability, service availability, etc. Depending on the need, there are more and more solutions out there which you can choose or blend to come up with the best fit to meet your needs. I would not look at the world only in terms of T1 and DS3. Consider 3G, FIOS, cable, DSL, ethernet, etc... Think about what your needs are and maybe pose a more specific question including what you are trying to accomplish, where, and at what budget. Then take advantage of no cost consulting services from DS3-Bandwidth.com for a free RFQ (Request For Quote) ..... and research for a final bandwidth solution. For Example .... you'll need to have a good handle on the following to make a smart decision : * Is the purpose to run video, VoIP or some other real-time application? * What is acceptable latency? * Is the application/service mission critical? * What access alternatives are offered in your area? * How much are they and what is your budget? * What are future business needs that this solution will need to meet? * Where will the network need to connect to? Is it DIA, point-to-point or MPLS? * Do you expect high paced future growth? If so plan for expansion into possibly OC3 bandwidth but do NOT go that route yet. It's too soon. All of these questions (and probably more) need to be considered when providing an answer otherwise you will inevitably come up short. For example an enterprise may find it sufficient to use DSL bandwidth if it is only for cafeteria internet access, while a small business may not be able to afford to use a DSL for mission-critical access to its hosted PBX and systems. It really depends.
|